Click or Scan to join WhatsApp
COURSE ARCH 2G4/3G7
This thesis section asks students to use the tools of scenography, virtual production, and livestreaming to conceive of an architectural thesis. Rather than pit digital against physical, we will collectively reflect on the possibility of architecture to ground human experience in media rich environments.
The term “virtual production” refers to the workflows that hybridize digital and physical spaces in real time. These technologies are most often used in broadcast television productions like sports commentary and cable news. Live feeds of people and physical objects in front of a chroma key (green screen) are blended with digital objects and spaces to create a seamless image of people in space in real time. “Livestreaming” refers to the workflows most often used by well-known gamers to broadcast their gameplay and simultaneously interact with their live audience, usually via chat. Our thesis group will begin by experimenting with these workflows to explore their possibilities as representational tools and architectural propositions that hybridize physical and digital embodiment. By incorporating the ever-expanding array of digital tools into architectural design, our hope is to infuse bodily experience with the same vivid visuals our screens use to hold our attention.
Adam Fure & Thom Moran
afure@umich.edu
tjmoran@umich.edu
Mon,Thurs
1pm - 6pm
afure@umich.edu
tjmoran@umich.edu
Mon,Thurs
1pm - 6pm
COURSE ARCH 2G4/3G7
This thesis section will challenge participants to situate architecture within the fundamental impossibility of limitless economic growth in any sustainable planetary future. As scientists from across disciplines have claimed for decades, in order to reach a just and sustainable society, a phase of degrowth is unavoidable. Degrowth refers to a reduction in the production, circulation, and consumption of our energetic, material, and informational resources — all variants and interconnected forms of energy dissipation when conceived from a thermodynamics perspective. The correlations between energy dissipation, economic growth, climate change, and social injustice are undeniable. Attempts at decoupling supposed “green growth” and environmental degradation have proven to be not only scientifically impossible, but also a distraction from effective strategies for transitioning into sustainable practices (Parrique, 2019). So too, technological innovation in renewable energy will not save the day. The shift to renewable energy is far from enough, and each new technology necessitates regimes of resource extraction that reiterate ecological degradation and social inequity. Only a fundamental and radical reduction of energy dissipation, and by extension, Gross Domestic Profit, will be effective.
As a discipline and as a profession, architecture is intricately entangled with economic growth. Especially in the context of neoliberalism, there are scant professional commissions with proforma not grounded in bases of economic expansion. Meanwhile, our disciplinary imagination assumes the development of the new as a given — this, the pervasive legacy of a modernist avant garde pitted against the past. All the while, it is clear that any new construction is unsustainably energy intensive, as evidenced through recent calls for a “moratorium on new construction.” Equally clear is that a full moratorium today would threaten to ossify patterns of inequity, and asymmetrical societal well-being that characterize present forms of uneven “development.”
This section is interested in a multiplicity of responses across scales that situate architecture’s future at the complex intersection of the social, economic, and ecological contexts of degrowth. While the specter of degrowth often elicits associations of austerity or decline, we are most interested in projects that instead forward alternative notions of abundance and prosperity, celebrating societal values beyond economic activity. How might the built environment participate in the (re)emergence of energetically frugal ways of dwelling, lifestyles, and rituals? Can an ethic of care, maintenance, and repair enable the recovery of lost know-how and mindful behaviors that would help restore a healthier socioeconomic metabolism? What can we learn from non-western, indigenous, or vernacular practices and epistemologies about the stewardship of our social and physical environment? Can we put our capacities at the service of exnovation processes that, far from being restrictive, offer an opulence of pleasures and creative engagements with life itself? Can we imagine ebullient aesthetic regimes of degrowth?
McLain Clutter & Mireille Roddier
mclainc@umich.edu
mroddier@umich.edu
Mon,Thurs
1pm - 6pm
mclainc@umich.edu
mroddier@umich.edu
Mon,Thurs
1pm - 6pm
COURSE ARCH 2G4/3G7
In the fall semester, the Constructed Actors thesis prep group cultivated a more nuanced understanding of architecture, urban design, and development by sparking new lines of inquiry through the study of storytelling traditions, with a particular focus on puppetry. This exploration was enriched by a culturally comparative analysis of puppetry’s allied disciplines—scenography and performance—providing fertile ground for critical engagement and creative speculation.
Historians recognize puppetry as one of the oldest art forms, a tradition that has endured not merely because of its accessibility and adaptability, but also due to its profound entanglement with cultural memory. Across epochs and societies, puppets have consistently transcended their inanimate forms to serve as vehicles for education, entertainment, and the articulation of societal values. What ensures puppetry's persistence is its unique ability to convey ideas too complex, fraught, or dangerous for human actors to embody. It engages with the unspeakable, allowing for the exploration of themes that might otherwise remain concealed or suppressed.
As an analogical framework, puppet theater offers a compelling lens through which to interrogate architecture and its production. Puppet theater’s control mechanisms, scenographic constructs, juxtapositions of situation and soundscape, and embodiments of agency and manipulation reflect the forces shaping architectural production. Like the puppet, architecture is embedded in a nexus of social, political, and economic influences. Thesis prep invited you to work independently or collaboratively to examine these power structures and better understand how the built environment is animated and imbued with meaning, identity, and purpose. In this context, architecture was no longer seen as static but as a dynamic entity brought to life through its interactions with society, much as the puppet gains significance through the forces that animate it.
Anya Sirota
asirota@umich.edu
Mon,Thurs
1pm - 6pm
asirota@umich.edu
Mon,Thurs
1pm - 6pm
COURSE ARCH 2G4/3G7
This thesis section aims to interrogate the means of developing an architectural argument through the tectonics of the building. In recent years, many thesis projects have aimed to construct a narrative thesis that signals a series of important intentions and an agenda for architecture. While this work has been profound and necessary, it has often left behind the means by which architecture is able to operate in the world and manifest itself as such; the building fabric. The term ‘Tectonic’ identifies a material assembly and an organizational structure. This thesis section believes that it is possible to develop an architectural thesis that is augmented by the tectonics of the building, carefully considering its materiality, composition, embodied carbon, relationality to other systems within the building, and perhaps most importantly, its relation to cultural codes; current and historic.
The proposed methodology for this section will pay careful consideration to the study of precedents; by studying and analyzing existing buildings, students will create their ‘personal canons’. The idea of a ‘canon’ has fallen out of fashion in efforts to decolonize the discipline and expand upon the voices that have contributed to architectural history. Still, this studio will utilize the contestation of a canon as a methodology of historical analysis, which will allow each student to branch out and identify the influences that will be embedded in the thesis project. The studio will embrace what Jonathan Lethem has called ‘The Ectasys of Influence’ rebuking ‘The Anxiety of Influence’ framed by Harold Bloom, a central figure who has defended the Western canon in literature. By discussing and developing a shared architectural canon as a studio, each student will be invited to manifest points of departure due to personal interest or due to cultural perspectives. In this fashion, the studio will be constantly evaluating the relationship between collective knowledge and personal contribution.
In this thesis section, we will explore the methodology of 'close reading buildings,' an approach that draws inspiration from the literary technique of close reading, where texts are meticulously examined to uncover deeper meanings, nuances, and layers of interpretation. Just as a literary scholar dissects a text to understand its structure, themes, and rhetorical strategies, we will carefully 3D model and analyze buildings as precedents to unravel the intricate relationships between form, function, and context. By engaging in this rigorous examination, students will gain a deeper appreciation of architectural design, uncovering the subtle interplay of materiality, spatial organization, and cultural significance that defines the built environment. This method encourages a heightened sensitivity to the architectural details that contribute to the overall narrative of a building, fostering a critical understanding that will inform and enrich your own design practices.
Jose Sanchez
jomasan@umich.edu
Mon,Thurs
1pm - 6pm
jomasan@umich.edu
Mon,Thurs
1pm - 6pm
COURSE ARCH 2G4/3G7
In the culinary traditions of Meso-America, masa is ground corn flour that binds together a diversity of cultural practices. While there exist many unique geographies to locate the theoretical underpinnings of an architectural thesis, this thesis unit will focus on Mexico City to situate a wide range of possible design trajectories. Mexico City: 25 million people. The 6th largest city in the world: 2,240 meters [7,350 feet] above sea-level, volcanic, seismic, DTW>MEX = 4.5 hours. MASA - Mexico Architecture Studio Alliance - is a collective for urban and architectural research that co-locates design-based research within the intersectional diversity of this incredible mega-city. MASA provides an open platform that seeks to critically reposition the thesis within the rich cultural context of Mexico City. All thesis agendas, positions, and hunches are welcome within the MASA orbit. MASA emphasizes developing critical methods and core techniques for advanced architectural research by refining the communicative structure of architecture through speculative and applied work that is actionable.
Robert Adams & Dawn Gilpin
robadams@umich.edu
dgilpin@umich.edu
Mon,Thurs
1pm - 6pm
robadams@umich.edu
dgilpin@umich.edu
Mon,Thurs
1pm - 6pm
COURSE UD722
This thesis section asks students to use the tools of scenography, virtual production, and livestreaming to conceive of an architectural thesis. Rather than pit digital against physical, we will collectively reflect on the possibility of architecture to ground human experience in media rich environments.
The term “virtual production” refers to the workflows that hybridize digital and physical spaces in real time. These technologies are most often used in broadcast television productions like sports commentary and cable news. Live feeds of people and physical objects in front of a chroma key (green screen) are blended with digital objects and spaces to create a seamless image of people in space in real time. “Livestreaming” refers to the workflows most often used by well-known gamers to broadcast their gameplay and simultaneously interact with their live audience, usually via chat. Our thesis group will begin by experimenting with these workflows to explore their possibilities as representational tools and architectural propositions that hybridize physical and digital embodiment. By incorporating the ever-expanding array of digital tools into architectural design, our hope is to infuse bodily experience with the same vivid visuals our screens use to hold our attention.
Cyrus Peñarroyo
penarc@umich.edu
Mon,Thurs
1pm - 6pm
penarc@umich.edu
Mon,Thurs
1pm - 6pm
COURSE ARCH442
Extreme weather, increased greenhouse emissions and resource extraction, industrial farming, damaged ecosystems, contaminated landscapes, economic and political unrest are forcing the displacement of masses of the human and non-human migrants. In this studio, displacement is the matter of concern 1 . Climate, disaster and conflict induced displacement are dispersed, beginning everywhere, shifting and swaying in search of refuge, with a gradual unraveling of what is familiar. Drifters occupy spaces and moments beyond spatially and temporally legible peripheries, deprived of ground. 2 In this studio, we will explore the role of architecture in unfolding narratives of displacement to initiate dialogue addressing the complex political ecology and the uncovering of inequalities.
We will position ourselves within theoretical frameworks, situate events within historical timelines, and nurture our socio-political and ecological inquisitiveness. We will go beyond disciplinary boundaries to fields beyond our own and learn from environmental and political activists, artists, journalists, field biologists and others. Guided by both science and poetry 3 , swapping objects for agents 4 , driven by intentional observation we will explore how architectural investigations and propositions may reconstruct perceptions and offer projected realities and speculative fabulations rooted in ecological consciousness, assemblages of care, and the resilience needed to sustain vulnerable relations for a future not so far.
Zain AbuSeir
zaina@umich.edu
Mon,Wed,Fri
1pm - 6pm
zaina@umich.edu
Mon,Wed,Fri
1pm - 6pm
COURSE ARCH 432
You might not think about the U.S. Post Office all that much. Maybe you haven’t visited in a while. Or maybe you’ve never been. Perhaps your prevailing associations with the Postal Service are limited to junk mail, long lines, cheap construction, and disgruntled employees. It’s true that the Postal Service as an American institution is hurting, and has been for some time. By the end of this studio, though, you'll gain a deeper appreciation for the USPS as a cornerstone of the nation's development, and, hopefully, feel a renewed commitment to its resurgence as a crucial element of civic infrastructure.
Historically, the United States Postal Service has been a cornerstone in the development of the United States, responsible for creating a communications network that linked diverse communities across the nation. It promoted literacy, education, commerce, and civic discourse by providing an affordable and reliable means for communication. In contemporary America, the USPS remains the most widespread government agency, with the largest fleet of vehicles and the most physical locations in both urban and rural areas of any government or commercial entity. Despite this reach, the USPS continues to face significant challenges, grappling with cultural, social, and technological changes that have led to a decline in use of their services.
Post Office + as a studio addresses this decline head-on, challenging students to propose a new model for a post office in the city of Ypsilanti, Michigan. The imperative for the USPS to adapt or face obsolescence calls for creative solutions that not only address current issues but also reimagine the post office as a vital civic center for years to come.
What’s your Post Office +?
Jacob Comerci
comerci@umich.edu
Mon,Wed,Fri
1pm - 6pm
comerci@umich.edu
Mon,Wed,Fri
1pm - 6pm
COURSE ARCH 432
Postal Pop Up invites students to explore imaginary scenarios that exist in a speculative future following the full implementation of US Postmaster General Louis DeJoy’s “Delivering for America” Plan. The ambitious and controversial plan attempts to address the institution’s continued decline. With a focus on network optimization, one of the plan’s key components combines investment into sustainable vehicles with the consolidation of existing local postal routes into Sorting and Delivery Centers. Although this approach offers a streamlined alternative to cumbersome existing infrastructure, it also leaves many local post offices with surplus space and an uncertain future. This hypothetical future, one in which local post offices are empty and obsolete, is where the studio resides.
This studio proposes utilizing temporary “pop up” strategies as an alternative framework to the traditional post office building. Here, "pop up" refers to structures and spatial configurations that can appear and disappear; potential scenarios are tested and alternative uses are considered through research into materials and technologies for what a post office might offer.
These types of structures have played a role in development throughout the US Postal Service’s history, from inhabitable vehicles like highway buses, rail, boat and air mail services to pop-ups during high-demand periods and disaster events. Building upon this past of innovation, the studio will explore transient strategies that may offer new ways to maintain, expand, and embed post offices within the communities they serve.
The studio will begin by examining vehicles used for mail transportation throughout history, uncovering how the post office has adapted to connect people regardless of circumstance. We will also analyze case studies of temporary architecture, emphasizing assemblies, activities, and sequences. By reconfiguring the findings from these investigations, the studio will reimagine the evolving needs of future post offices as testing grounds for material, programmatic, and temporal explorations.
Olaia Chivite Amigo
olaia@umich.edu
Mon,Wed,Fri
1pm - 6pm
olaia@umich.edu
Mon,Wed,Fri
1pm - 6pm
COURSE ARCH 432
In 2014, the curators of the Venice Biennale, provided a critical refl ection, of the previous century, on contem porary architecture, emphasizing the importance of considering histories, material culture, political environments, and architectural elements from around the globe. This perspective will serve as a launching point for our studio's exploration, which aims to bridge the past with speculative futures.
This studio will engage with the evolving state of architecture and project forward to the year 2114. Our focus will be on designing a civic institution dedicated to mail drop-off , delivery, and sorting. This institution will not only refl ect the current needs of our society but also anticipate and shape future requirements for public exchange.
We will examine the evolution of long-distance communication, tracing its development from ancient methods to contemporary practices. This historical perspective will inform our design, ensuring that it acknowledges and integrates past innovations while addressing future needs.
By investigating the interplay between material culture and political environments, we aim to develop a design that is resilient and adaptable. This will involve a thorough analysis of how materials have been used historically and how political changes have infl uenced architectural practices.
The studio will produce a forward-thinking design that addresses both the legacy and future of civic mail services, positioning the institution as a pivotal component of public infrastructure for the 21st century and beyond.
Dawn Gilpin
dgilpin@umich.edu
Mon,Wed,Fri
1pm - 6pm
dgilpin@umich.edu
Mon,Wed,Fri
1pm - 6pm
COURSE ARCH 432
This studio will focus upon the themes of distance, measure and the “materiality of abstraction.” Beginning with a series of 3 preliminary exercises, students will explore the interplay among different sizes and scales, and research a variety of spatial typolgoies in which the terms and coordinates of one geographical location are imported into the setting of another - such as embassies, world fair pavilions, and gardens.
Part 1 Exercises
X1 Photo Narrative: The Materiality of Abstraction A series of photographs that explore the intersection of abstraction and materiality in the built environment.
X2 Elements: Building Elements as Signs Using Rem Koolhaas’s Elements research (in which he presents brief histories of various building components, such as windows, doors, roofs, floors, and walls), students will consider the literal and abstract dynamics inherent to familiar building components. For instance- windows frame “views” and doors provide “thresholds.”
X3 Three-Dimensional Map: The Thingness of Maps A conceptual model that merges ideas from the first two exercises.
Part 2
Building Design The second part of the semester will be organized around the design of a post office with additional uses that provide sites of public encounters as determined by each student.
Projects will be sited in Ann Arbor.
Keith Mitnick
kmitnick@umich.edu
Mon,Wed,Fri
1pm - 6pm
kmitnick@umich.edu
Mon,Wed,Fri
1pm - 6pm
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN VII (2G3/3G6) – COURSE BRIEF
COURSE ARCH 672
This studio is an introduction to urban simulation as a design tool. The course will be both technical and theoretical, connecting notions of programming and simulation with the nature of computer modeling and ecological perspectives towards non-human agents. The studio will provide a series of technical tutorials for developing simulations within the Unity3D game engine environment, inviting students to collaborate to develop an interactive urban simulation game.
The study of complex adaptive systems in architecture has been characterized through a shift toward formalism, in which simulations of flocks and swarms become techniques for complex geometrical modeling. Such approaches fail to harness the opportunity of developing an ecological awareness around the possible interactions between systems within a design domain. The simulation of ecologies relies on key concepts such as feedback loops and interdependence between actors. Such actors can be identified as both humans and non-humans. An object-oriented framework enables each actor to establish interactions with other actors without a hierarchy.
The simulation of an ecosystem requires defining agents as species and their interactions within an environment. As a design class, this course will expand the notion of species to include the built environment. By modeling interactions between digital entities, it is possible to give rise to emergent phenomena: intelligence as collective behaviors that might be considered unexpected from the behavior of an individual agent but arise once certain informational thresholds are crossed.
This class will provide the theoretical foundations to understand complex phenomena by modeling networks of interactions inviting students to design models that operate as ecologies.
In this course, students will explore the development of urban simulations through a hands-on approach that begins with the creation of physical prototypes in the form of board games. These prototypes serve as a foundational tool for understanding the complexities of urban transactions and interactions between various constituencies. By simulating these dynamics in a tangible, analog format, students will gain insights into the mechanics and challenges of urban design. The course will then guide students through the iterative process of translating these prototypes into digital formats, ultimately developing multiplayer video game simulations using Unity 3D. This methodology emphasizes the importance of both physical and digital modeling in capturing the complexities of urban environments, preparing students to create interactive experiences that reflect on urban trade-offs between different constituencies.
KEYWORDS: Simulation, Programming, Ecologies, Object-oriented thinking, Interdependence, Simulation, Models, Emergence, Complex Adaptive Systems, Interactive Systems, Boardgames, Video games
Jose Sanchez
jomasan@umich.edu
Mon,Wed,Fri
1pm - 6pm
jomasan@umich.edu
Mon,Wed,Fri
1pm - 6pm
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN VII (2G3/3G6) – COURSE BRIEF
COURSE ARCH 672
The role of architectural detailing today is often one of concealment. Have you ever noticed that we try to hide a lot of things within a wall? We don’t seem to like the messiness of all the active-systems technology that makes our buildings inhabitable. All of this hiding allows for a slight of hand, to draw your attention away from what is really happening. Instead of being a driver of the project, detailing is often an afterthought. However, given architects choose what to express and what to hide, detailing is highly political.
As a setting for this course, we will use the fictional (and climate fluid) American town of Westerchester as a backdrop to explore many issues linked to the embodiment of the American dream. In this context, the mis-direction detailing affords is often co-opted as a structural and political technique that underpins many of the challenges facing the US today: increasing inequality, systemic racism, climate change, housing unaffordability, among others. We design cities that cannot function without a car, buildings that would mold and rot without constant energy use, and homes that are designed for an ideal that most people can’t meet, let alone afford. While architects are not in a position to offer policy solutions to these many issues, the act of detailing can be an effective political tool for a broader public engagement.
One of the biggest instigators of this noted architectural shift toward details of concealment is the widespread adoption of the rainscreen as the dominant construction method in the US and Northern Europe. The rainscreen requires that the aesthetics of an exterior cladding layer mask the internalized functional performance of the wall. It also has the effect of rendering its exterior homogenous, or disconnected. That is, climate can be instrumentalized as a representational ideal of performance, not necessarily responsive to context, let alone the current existential crisis. This shift to a representational materiality of architecture (and of climate), establishes a purposeful misreading, leaving an unresolved tension between these actors.
This course will use the detail as a site of investigation to intersect the expression of techno-performative issues of climate and building science with the formal agendas of popular culture vernaculars and futurisms.
The town of Westerchester will serve as a stage set as we play out our detailing investigation in four acts:
ACT I - HOT TAKES: as an initial investigation, it will confront prevailing design ideologies through sports-take debate as a means to identify our own positions on detailing and material expression. Students will derive a representative kit of detail parts relating to both technology and cultural considerations (active systems, passive systems, popular vernaculars, popular futurisms) and use them to populate a generic digital model of Westerchester’s town center.
ACT II - COLD CUTS: as an introductory tutorial, it will utilize emerging technology workflows to establish both representational and fabrication based methods for designing new architectural materials
ACT III - DRY RUN: as a group fabrication exercise where students will construct a detail enclosure to interact with a designed climate machine. Effectively as an architized version of a typical highschool chemistry experiment, students will use art practice techniques to compose scenes of engagement between artifact and environment.
ACT IV - WET DETAILS: as a final design exercise, students will develop an expanded “wet” detail, which embraces the messy reality of intersecting contextual forces. These slippery details will inform the selection of a climate expanded program to be placed within the cultural fabric of Westerchester. Details, Plans, and Visualizations will be formatted into a catalog house advertisement type hybrid drawing.
Ryan Ball
ballra@umich.edu
Mon,Thu
1pm - 6pm
ballra@umich.edu
Mon,Thu
1pm - 6pm
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN VII (2G3/3G6) – COURSE BRIEF
COURSE ARCH 672
Nurtured by the perennial waters of the Tamiraparani River, the Tirunelveli District is a well-known migratory bird corridor and a nesting colony for local aquatic birds. The mature Banyan, Marudhu, and Neem trees and the many forests and wetlands punctuating the region provide a thriving habitat. Every year, the bountiful monsoon redraws the fertile Tamiraparani riverbanks, with the temples and the sacred rituals as the memory markers of a landscape always in shift. This riverine ecosystem is also the home to an endless constellation of small towns and villages that have historically cultivated and worshiped land and water and the many forms of life they sustain. The Tamiraparani, "river of red leaves," was considered holy in the Ramayana and the Mahabharata Sanskrit books, and well known for its pearl, fishery, shell, and other trades.
Recognizing the distinctive socio-ecological values of these natural and cultural landscapes, the Thiruppudaimarudur Bird Conservation Reserve (TBCR) was created in 2005, the first of its kind in India. The bird habitat is located within the confines of the temple of Naarambunathar of Lord Shiva and Goddess Gomathi and the adjoining village. Overseeing the confluence with the Gadananathi River, the village comprises 430 households whose primary occupation is agriculture. Villagers coexist with a rich mosaic of habitats within a primarily riparian landscape rich in species of birds, amphibians, fishes, smaller mammals, trees, and grasses. Testimony of the archeological importance of the site, the 14th-century-old Naarambunathar-Gomathiammal temple contains scripts and inscriptions, pictures of birds carved in stone, and wall murals marking a site of historical importance that Kings traveled for rituals and war.
Working toward the conservation of biodiversity, the protection of historical heritage, and the prosperity of the local communities, the Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (ATREE) is currently developing a study on the concept of eco-tourism as part of conservation and awareness strategy for TBCR. Based at the Agasthyamalai Community Conservation Centre (ACCC) in Manimutharu, the team is conducting community-based research and environmental education activities. The study contemplates (1) Water management, (2) Conservation Initiatives that engage local communities, and (3) Socio-economic activities supporting local livelihood.
This MArch + MUD interdisciplinary research studio will work collaboratively with ATREE to study and document the landscape values of the Tamiraparani River in the Thiruppudaimarudur Bird Conservation Reserve and the surrounding region. Our investigations will inform a design framework for an interpretation center supporting the regional eco-tourism initiative. The semester will require a sustained commitment to collaborative work and co-design methods.
This studio section will engage in fieldwork in the second week of October, around Fall Break. We will stay at the ACCC (map it!) and participate in a series of site visits and activities led by our community partner, ATREE. While not required, participating in the trip is highly encouraged. This studio section has a lab fee of $600 and the Architecture Program has preliminarily approved a travel stipend of $1,500 per student. We will be frugal and travel modestly to stay on that budget.
Maria Arquero
marquero@umich.edu
Mon,Thu
1pm - 6pm
marquero@umich.edu
Mon,Thu
1pm - 6pm
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN VII (2G3/3G6) – COURSE BRIEF
COURSE ARCH 672
Michigan has garnered media attention as a potential "climate haven," a refuge for those seeking respite from the intensifying impacts of climate change within the United States. Yet, the Upper Peninsula—representing 30% of the land area and home to only 3% of the state’s population—remains largely absent from these discussions. With its humid continental climate, rocky terrain with rolling hills, expanses of contiguous forestland, and redeveloping infrastructure, the Upper Peninsula poses unique challenges and opportunities that have yet to be fully explored. This studio offers a chance to re-imagine the Upper Peninsula, not just as a destination for domestic climate migrants, but as a region where design can thoughtfully respond the necessities of a changing world while integrating the needs of diverse species, infrastructures, and cultural practices.
The studio will take a multifaceted approach to envisioning the future of the region, exploring design interventions at multiple scales and through various lenses. From the redefinition of traditional homes and residential units to the design of ritual sites connected to afterworlds, from the re-imagining of transportation infrastructures to the creation of spaces for companion species, and from the revitalization of resource-rich areas like copper mines to innovative agricultural practices—we will engage in a comprehensive rethinking of what it means to design for a changing climate in the Upper Peninsula.
We will select one site out of a set of identified places within Michigan’s Upper Peninsula. The initial task is to conduct an in-depth study of the chosen site, focusing on its physical characteristics, ecological systems, historical and cultural significance, and existing infrastructure. We will then propose an issue/position/strategy that reimagines the site through one or more of the following lenses:
• Home: Residential environments in response to climate adaptation
• Afterworlds: Spaces honoring life, death, memory and indigenous ritual practices • Resources: Agricultural and mining landscapes for responsible climate futures
• Companion Species: Spaces fostering connections between humans and non-humans
• Infrastructure: Transportation networks and pathways for climate-adaptive futures
Building on the initial framing, we will identify and address a specific climate change-related issue impacting our site. This could range from rising water levels, shifts in biodiversity, to challenges in resource management, among other potential climate impacts. We will conduct a thorough analysis of how this issue influences our site, examining both immediate and long-term effects. As a last step, we will propose collectively a comprehensive and interconnected vision, out of site-specific interventions, that address evolving climate challenges while setting the groundwork for long-term environmental systems across the Upper Peninsula.
El Hadi Jazairy
ejazairy@umich.edu
Mon,Thu
1pm - 6pm
ejazairy@umich.edu
Mon,Thu
1pm - 6pm
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO I – COURSE BRIEF
COURSE UD 712
This studio is concerned with imagining and articulating how urban design, as a discipline, practice, and material reality, can help uphold the Rights of Nature. Exploring the emerging paradigm of “exist, flourish, and evolve,” the studio will produce concrete manifestations of reciprocity embodied in more-than-human rights. Our multifaceted subject will be the sixty watersheds of ‘Michigan’, whose ecological communities and dynamics will figure as protagonists in our studio. We will seek to reinforce indigenous cultures and grapple with environmental institutions, such as real property and conservation law. Acknowledging that Rights of Nature are, for the moment, written aspirations, our goal will be to develop the spatial dimensions that could support them. In late September 2024, the studio will travel to sites across the region at the front of decolonial climate action.
From their mills, muck farms, canals, factories, and town sites, settler-pioneers oversaw the exposure of ‘Michigan’ to the expedient glow of frontier capitalism. Using the rivers and tributaries, they ushered the region’s forests and wetlands through a process of industrial sublimation. Settler infrastructures and commodities emerged through a drastic recasting of ecological and social relations. In ‘Michigan’ and elsewhere, the imperative of growth and settlement enabled the simplification of complex environments to a matter of “resources.” Yet, two centuries of industrial productivity and urbanization have caused such ecosystemic shifts that the notion of stability—and that of nature and culture–are now challenged.
The fallout of colonial-capitalist territoriality in ‘Michigan’ urges designers to consider new approaches that account for the agency of more-than-human entities. The concept of the Rights of Nature may offer a useful framework for this purpose. The Rights of Nature recognize the entitlement of landscapes, ecosystems, and more-than-human entities to—according to the legal phrasing—“exist, flourish, and evolve.” This reflects Native and vernacular practices, and tribes and governments in the region increasingly recognize these rights through legislation. For example, in April 2024, Sault Ste. Marie Tribe adopted The Rights of More than Human Relatives, establishing the rights of its “first family” to “thrive,” and nearby, in January 2019, White Earth Nation legislated The Rights of Manoomin, establishing the rights of wild rice to “exist, flourish, regenerate, and evolve.” Such initiatives demand that designers register earthly agencies, indigenous land practices, and contemporary legal-spatial theory. How might urban design thus contribute to the imagining and implementation of reciprocal environmental values and practices?
Gabriel Cuellar
gcuellar@umich.edu
Mon,Thu
1pm - 6pm
gcuellar@umich.edu
Mon,Thu
1pm - 6pm
Winter 2024
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN IV (UG4)
COURSE ARCH 442 | WALLENBERG
Coming soon.
Zain Abuseir
zaina@umich.edu
Mon,Wed,Fri
1pm - 6pm
zaina@umich.edu
Mon,Wed,Fri
1pm - 6pm
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN IV (UG4)
COURSE ARCH 442 | WALLENBERG
Coming soon.
Neal Robinson
rbneal@umich.edu
Mon,Wed,Fri
1pm - 6pm
rbneal@umich.edu
Mon,Wed,Fri
1pm - 6pm
THESIS STUDIO (2G4/3G7)
COURSE ARCH 662
Coming soon.
McLain Clutter
mclainc@umich.edu
Mireille Roddier
mroddier@umich.edu
Mon,Thu
1pm - 6pm
mclainc@umich.edu
Mireille Roddier
mroddier@umich.edu
Mon,Thu
1pm - 6pm
THESIS STUDIO (2G4/3G7)
COURSE ARCH 662
Coming soon.
Thom Moran
tjmoran@umich.edu
Adam Fure
afure@umich.edu
Mon,Thu
1pm - 6pm
tjmoran@umich.edu
Adam Fure
afure@umich.edu
Mon,Thu
1pm - 6pm
THESIS STUDIO (2G4/3G7)
COURSE ARCH 662
Coming soon.
Anya Sirota
sirota@akoaki.com
Mon,Thu
1pm - 6pm
sirota@akoaki.com
Mon,Thu
1pm - 6pm
THESIS STUDIO (2G4/3G7)
COURSE ARCH 662
Coming soon.
Jose Sanchez
jomasan@umich.edu
Mon,Thu
1pm - 6pm
jomasan@umich.edu
Mon,Thu
1pm - 6pm
THESIS STUDIO (2G4/3G7)
COURSE ARCH 662
Coming soon.
Cyrus Penarroyo
penarc@umich.edu
Mon,Wed,Fri
1pm - 6pm
penarc@umich.edu
Mon,Wed,Fri
1pm - 6pm